6 April 2020
Mallarmé, and the effect of dusk
It was near clear the other night and I had fun. It was a gentle, humid sky held in a thin diaphanous veil of pigment, the kind of sky I love working from. Like many from this series, its drawing is ultra simple, and when clear, empty of much drama. Others, with a more complicated drawing can be more theatrical as when clouds swarm the sky, but this one merely hints at the suggestion of any substance.
At University, I must have skipped the lecture on the Symbolist poet, Stephane Mallarmé in French Lit class but I certainly came across him later on when I read about Impressionism of which he was a huge fan. With wonderful clarity he wrote about Painting during this revolutionary period of the second half of 20th century France. But come to think of it, when has France ever not been revolutionary? The country seems to be in a perpetual state of revolt because the French are serious thinkers, and as Zen monks warn us, thinking a lot leads to frustration, (just sayin).
So recently, perusing the world through Google, I came across a small piece that Mallarme had written about Manet. He described how The Impressionists had changed the nature of Painting. He marveled at their explorations into light as if they were scientists foraging through the metaphoric and transient substance of the air itself. He described the vibrant colours and the play of light in a painting as both a fusion and struggle between surface and space, between color and air. I liked that and it really resonated with me.
His own investigations into the ephemeral sensuality of poetry appeared to parallel their own work as painters. The air, as it occupies an empty space, seemed to be a counterpoint to Mallarme’s work as a Symbolist poet. This new young generation writers and artists would soon send 19th century Realism to the guillotine. For the first time ever, the viewer was to become a participant in the Art because a landscape, portrait or poem, was no longer merely a decorative account but an existential examination. For these ‘Modernists’, Paintings and would henceforth became an interaction that elicited a response from the public. Every Art form was changed forever, and with one small pirouette, Post-Modernism was already born.
Expressing the inexpressable, was already something Mallarme had himself become obsessed with it, and he looked for it everywhere in both painting and poetry. To bypass an out-moded form of Realism became a ‘cri de coeur’ for these new artists. And what could possibly be more inexpressable than to paint the air itself?
In this study here, I found myself taken in by the soft quality of the velvet sky, but as with many of these studies, it’s the air itself which is what interests me the most. It’s the tiny thread that connects all breathing elements here on earth. And as a painter, it is the most purplexing element to work from and render. This resonates for me perhaps because, like the accidental Symbolist that I seem to be, many of these pictures display virtually no content save for the water and air that make up the subject matter. I wonder what Mallarme would think of it?
In the painter’s world, the sea, being water, reflects back the ‘coulour’ of the sky overhead. In Malarme’s world, the sky becomes an empty pause, either an unfurnished phrasing of Debussy or a vacant space in one of his own poems, for this is the essence of Symbolism, but also the birth of Minimalism to arrive shortly.
The painter’s sky can appear invisible, but at certain times when he allows us to look up through it into space, we can see that it’s mostly gaseous in its various guises, and it provides the painter with a gluey substance with which to capture light from the sun. High cirrus clouds at dusk perform this task with grace and they give the painter a handhold onto the air itself.