These wonderful small sculptures made of tofu were created by the photographer, Suzanne Sarnoff, for the accompanying article in the NYT. Clever! She has a real talent.
So these pieces made me think of the celebrated British artist Rachel Whiteread who worked in concrete and plaster.
Below, is a photo of her famous piece entitled House, which won her the Turner prize back in 1993. The life-sizework was created from a concrete cast of the inside of the original house located at the edge of Wennington Green just off Grove road. I presume that the original house was then destroyed to reveal this interpretation of it, et voila! Apparently it was part of a set of row houses which were slated for demolition to create a park.
House lasted 11 weeks before it too was demolished. What a shame. It created quite a buzz during that time from both detractors and admirers. I like it. She's an interesting artist
Evening Prayer Brunswick Heads, 3 October 2023, oil on canvas board, 30 X 25 cm
I think everyone around the globe loves the French language for so many reasons even when they don't always understand it. What is it about that breathy self-assurance that casts a spell over us all?
Like many 'foreign' languages it holds an aesthetic resonance, but then so does Italian, Japanese, and Spanish, among others. Personally, I kind melt when I hear a Russian woman even just explaining street directions in Moscow.
Some languages are so melodious that they roll off the tongue in such a way that we're instantly transported to distant lands across the ocean. Naturally, our cultural legacy is that each language after centuries of evolution possess personal expressions that evoke the flavour and temperament of each country.
One of my favourites is indeed from France. It's the following:
"The best part of sex is climbing the stairs to the bedroom."
Now, because I often frequent Dr Google, I typed this curious adage into his little window to see if I could find out where it came from. Sadly, all that came up were thousands of articles like the following;
Sex Tips for Women: 15 Handy Tips on How to Be Better in Bed
And from Men's Health, a real beauty for the insecure man:
40 Foreplay Tips That Will Make the Sex So Much Hot
So as you can see, I was not going to come anywhere near anything heady or highbrow that might lead me to a reference page or a linguistic history of expressions from literary sources around the world. But, hey! I'll do further research on this and keep you posted.
So, "Revenons à nos moutons!" Another favourite of mine that means; 'to return to the subject at hand'. And thus, the subject I want to investigate is about Desire and Painting.
It occurred to me while watching a small TikTok clip of a sexy young woman singing and dancing to a slow Cha Cha Cha French song from the 1960's (Zsiou Bisou Bisou). The first minute of it was positively electric and desire appeared to spread like the measles throughout the cocktail party. I quickly understood that it was from the American television hit show,'Mad Men'. I missed that series, but anyway, like I said, the first minute of this clip was riveting to watch. Desire seemed to drip from everyone, men and women included during this 3:00 minute song. It was very sexy in the way that the French can sometimes be in real life though not always, because French films which we're all programmed to believe aren't real despite all the hype.
So, apparently, this one minute of TikTok got me all hot and bothered about desire, something we all know about because we feel it all the time. Isn't it that mysterious carnal perfume that floats around us at the moment when we're suddenly turned by someone, or something?
For centuries advertisers have exploited it to push certain brands of coffee, drive certain vehicles, smoke cigarettes, everything in fact. Without desire there would be no Art of Advertising, no Madison Avenue.
Being a painter, I naturally pondered this nuanced human sense in so far as it manifests in the world of Painting. How has desire infected the world Painting? It's so unlike the verisimilitude of photography that was invented at the end of the 19th century and which changed mankind forever. It was also immediately hijacked for the purpose of making lewd photos of women, by, and for men. Pornography had again erupted when desire was re-configured into a celluloid art form.
Somehow, it's not as easy to imagine something like an oil painting as provoking the same ardent verisimilitude of lust so easily transmitted through photographic means. 'Sexy' just doesn't seem to cut it in the abstract world of oil painting, though I do confess that I've personally seen at least one painting of a women which aroused in me something quite close. A picture of St Margaret and the Dragon by Titian in the Prado.
Titian (Titiano Vecellio) painted in 1565, The Prado Museum Collection, Madrid
It turned me on in the strangest kind of way when I saw it in my early and vulnerable twenties. Frankly, it turned me upside down and I've loved every woman painted by Titian ever since. Btw, his daughter Lavinia Vecellio was his muse and posed as a model for many of his pictures.
But when it comes to the creation of a painting I'm really talking about something completely different. It's not about the subject matter that interests me, but about how an artist paints a picture by pushing it right up to point that leaves a viewer on the edge of their seat. If the artist is clever enough to leave the picture in that state, then it will live on leaving future viewers in a state of perpetual longing. This is a place of limbo that can separate a great work of art from all the rest. A successful painting, like any other work of art, leaves us in a state of desire.
So I propose the painting above (top), from October 3, 2023, to illustrate this idea. (And btw, I use my own work to show what it is that I'm pontificating about, because as they say, "I have a dog in this fight.")
So I guess what I'm trying get at is that it isn't the content, or subject matter, that is as important as the way a picture is painted. That is to say that what is left out of a picture is often more important than what has been included in it. Thus, the desire is created in the viewer by the clever manipulation of the painter.
When a painting arrives at its apex of desire, isn't it bit like a being on a roller coaster at the amusement park when the fragile cable car into which we are all strapped teeters at the very peak of the first drop before plummeting earthward leaving us screaming with delight? It's a place between two worlds of thought, where pure emotion resides.
This is the exact opposite of pornography, because paintings too, can also be pornographic when they reveal more to us than is absolutely necessary in order to convey an idea. Consequently, an image that is overloaded needlessly die from excess weight. A successful picture draws the viewer in, while an unsuccessful one pushes a viewer away.
For instance, I was once walking with a friend on a busy boardwalk by the sea. A young woman wearing just leggings skipped past us. My friend remarked that Leggings were the greatest thing that Fashion had invented in our own generation. I didn't say anything, but all at once I saw just how differently we understood sexiness in a woman. Indeed, the majority of men seem to love leggings too because the woman's outline is promptly available for all the world to admire and judge so instantaneously.
I realised just how differently I looked at women (and art), almost 180 degrees actually. I am clearly in the minority on this because for me, a desire is evoked when a women strolls the boardwalk not in leggings but wearing a French dress from the 1940's. But hey! Isn't it great that we're all so different?
So as a painter, especially in this series at the beach, I'm mostly interested finding that exact moment at the very place when the parameters of an image might suggest the fullest expression of the sea and sky. It's a place of yearning to be sure, one not unlike some of the symphonies of Mahler.
Here is a more recent picture from the 18th of April 2025, that might further speak of my search of this ideal lyricism. Of course every painter must work from his/her own ideals. These are simply my own.
Addendum: Because I'm a dreamer, my secret desire as a painter is to leave a viewer astonished. Yes, yes, I know, I know,,, lots of artists desire this as well, and so they should!
After all, we creators like to think that we are all gods and maybe we're all just too foolish enough to attempt it in the first place. Me, maybe even more so because I apparently want to explain it too.
Evening Prayer Brunswick Heads, 7 April 2025, oil on canvas board,
30 X 25 cm
Here are two studios from a few nights ago. It had been a vivid bloom but short-lived due to the waxing moon that threw everything out of kilter. It will be full in a night or two, then I can get back to paint. The weather is still wonky with rain but in April it's usually like that.
The study above, as one can imagine, was painted when the bloom was at its raging peak. The sea was blood-red but then turned purple as it habitually will do in the after-burn. Eventually it will go deep blue again before nightfall swallows it up all.
The study below is less sexy but is far more compelling for me. It wasn't less fun, just more interesting to me. After all the melodrama of a colourful bloom, A sky, on an evening that is influenced by the light of the moon, will usually fall back into a serene placid state, as if exhausted by its own histrionics.
It's a curious light and one that still holds a lot of subtle colour. Because I love Art Deco, I really go crazy for any opportunity when I can use pink to counter a broken black.
This isn't quite it, but hey, there's always tomorrow. As the warmth of this pink sky climbs high into space and fades, a deliciously pale Prussian Blue/Lemon yellow forms underneath taking its place. So I'm fascinated by these colours, and I'm determined to exploit them whenever I can. In the studio I have several large canvas's (150 X 150 cm) that I'm struggling with with since last year. I never seem to get them right.
Perhaps an image like this less exciting than the more colourful pictures but like a scientist in a lab with his microscope, I've discovered
a whole world of rich and delicate nuances to explore. All of it hidden in plain sight with such simplicity.
Evening Prayer Brunswick Heads, 7 April 2025, oil on canvas board,
Evening Prayer Brunswick Heads, 5 April 2025, oil on canvas board,
30 X 25 cm
After almost a month's hiatus I finally managed to get out for a painting session two nights ago. I had not been there to work since the cyclone last month. The gentle dunes upon which I've painted for eight years were chopped off by the storm and now it drops to the beach just a metre in front of my little studio space. Feeling exposed, I now paint from the edge of a small cliff visible for all the beach walkers below. I feel like a lighthouse. Whew... it's very 19th century, and reminds me of a painting by Gustave Courbet of the artist as hero on a precipice.
I'll have to get used to it. It's so different from the comfort of being unseen. But anyway, it was a marvellous sky as seen in these three studies from the other night. I think they reveal a shift in the weather so hopefully I will be able to get out there more regularly from now on. These past months have been so rainy that I think we've forgotten what sunny afternoons look like anymore.
I also confess that since the US election and inauguration it's been a dispiriting period for everyone I know. It's hard to believe that one person can stuff up everything, including the rest of the world, so quickly. Of course, he got a lot of help from his cronies. Yes, we never imagined that it could happen in America. We'll see. More than ever it behooves us all to be creative and positive in every way we can because life goes on regardless of what's flung at us at times.
Evening Prayer Brunswick Heads, 5 April 2025, oil on canvas board,
30 X 25 cm
I loved working the other night, it replenished my spirits just to make a palette full of colours and be on the hunt for rich harmonies under a big bloom of a sky that seemed to last forever.
I like the first two very much, but this one below looks uneven to me though I'll post it anyway. Paintings don't always look the same way after a few days, weeks, months, years even, so I'm always cautious about judging them too quickly for better or worse.
I often think that I have exhausted this motif of anything new from which to scratch something out of. But then under the right kind of sky I discover that I could fall in love all over any expectations I'd have with a newer version of an old girlfriend, I'd also be more selective about what I'd want from this motif. I would want a clear 'bloom' of a sky to work from so as to explore a newer, more non-objective kind of picture. I'd look more for a flat picture plane. But as for the girlfriend, old, or new, I'd really like a kinder version, one with a big heart, as big as the sky actually.
Evening Prayer Brunswick Heads, 5 April 2025, oil on canvas board, 30 X 25 cm
Moonrise, Evening Prayer Brunswick Heads, 14 February 2025, oil on canvas board, 25 X 20 cm
This is from last month because I haven't been working out at the beach for a long time. The cyclone that roared through three weeks ago was a distraction and it ripped the sand dunes apart so I have been working at home. Whew.... lots of rain ever since has also altered my schedule.
But hey! Gotta stay productive as Uncle Morris in the Bronx always said.
This small study (above) is a curious thing because I don't usually go near a full moon. It's because it can come out looking tacky and basically sort of dumb or sentimental. Generally I don't even attempt painting it because it has already been done with great care by so many competent painters.
But I like the idea of a full moon painting if it's done with a personnel touch, not the Claude Lorraine kinds of knockoffs, but by the dark horses of Art history like Whistler and Albert Pinkham Ryder, two of my favourite painters.
Albert Pinkham Ryder, 1890, The Philips Collection, Washington D.C.
I have always loved this picture made somewhere on the Massachusetts coastline. He was the most prolific of all painters in this genre of 'the full moon' in American history. There are dozens of versions in various museums around the country.
He made something lugubriously original out of a simple full moon magically rising up over the sea. This is a fantastic image and beautifully crafted.
He was an odd recluse (like me!), but far more talented. But what the heck, I can still put my work up anyway. Normally I normally evade Moonrises because they kill the 'Bloom' of colour that I need for my own point of interest when I get out to the beach.
But in this small study of mine, I had somehow forgotten that the full moon was scheduled to arise when I went to work that afternoon. I usually check the app on my phone that spells out the moon phases but I forgot to check. Fortunately, as seen in my small study, it was cloudy, and the moon barely shone through the mass of clouds over the horizon so like they say, fake it if you can.
Anyway, I sort of liked it until I posted it too closely to Ryder's sublime painting situated below it. Yick,,, is all I can say about it now.
From the NYT last week was an article about a Chilean artist whose exhibit took place recently in the back room of butcher's shop in Copenhagen. (!) The subjects of the 'exhibition' were three piglets who were being starved to death. The theme was to voice discontent about the industrialisation of the entire unethical food industry. The small critters were given just water to drink as they headed into a deathly decline that was to have lasted about five days. But surprise, the upside to the story is that they somehow 'disappeared' when a door was mysteriously left ajar for a short time. They thus were spared of their cruel fate.
Personally, I think it was 'coup monté' rigged by the artist himself because (I believe), that he was in fact a lover of animals and he only wanted to make a stinky statement about how animals are treated. One cannot argue with that.
The artist, Marco Evaristti, (bless his heart), in the photo below, either really believes in this cause or is just cashing in to make some publicity. I think it's the former, and I even think he saved the piglets himself, but hey, what do I know?
(Disclaimer: I haven't eaten red meat or pork, or anything, except for about a dozen chickens since the Spring of 1980.
But I applaud the artist, if in fact his idea was to save the piglets in end. The Food industry is disgusting.
In 1971, when I was a freshmen at Denver University, a group of anti-war protesters designed and distributed flyers around campus declaring that they would napalm a Golden Retriever at a specified spot on a certain Saturday. Naturally, it cause an uproar as everyone went apoplectic.
"A dog! really?"
On the day on which it was supposed to happen there was a big crowd and also the campus police, but possibly even the Denver Police on hand to make arrests. Of course, it was just a hoax just to see how riled up people would become over the killing of a dog when at the same time, Vietnamese were being slaughtered by the Nixon regime.
I wasn't too involved either way, my cynicism had already been too well established in both heart and mind by that time and I just wanted to get the hell out of America and into a cafe in Paris.
And today, it's also a pretty insane time and I think it behooves us all to make our own decisions thoughtfully based on fact not fiction today.
An installation view of Jennifer J. Lee’s 2023 “Square Dance” exhibition at the Klaus von Nichtssagend Gallery in New York.Credit...Heidi Bohnenkamp Photography
The Art World’s Next Big Thing: Tiny Paintings
Works the size of postcards and bathroom tiles are challenging the market’s appetite for grand scales.
While the artists who make them vary in style and approach, they seem to share a somewhat old-fashioned view of what art is for: individual communion rather than collective spectacle — only one viewer can stand in front of each of these pieces at a time.
The scale echoes that of the source, squinted at on an iPad screen or laptop. Some of Lee’s most evocative works are around the size of a shower tile. She compares looking at one of her paintings in a gallery to peeking through a keyhole: “I love being able to beckon someone to look at something.”
Small paintings are also intimate, seductive and unpretentious. As Middleton puts it, they “creep up on you.” While the artists who make them vary in style and approach, they seem to share a somewhat old-fashioned view of what art is for: individual communion rather than collective spectacle — only one viewer can stand in front of each of these pieces at a time.
Mia Middleton’s 6.3-by-6.3-inch painting “Bill” (2023).Credit...Courtesy of the artist and Roberts Projects, Los Angeles. Photo: Paul Salveson
Today, some artists and dealers are looking to cultivate sustainability by staying small. “Why can’t we have a middle-class existence? Why do we have to make hundreds of thousands of dollars?” asks Lee. “All I’ve ever wanted is to keep going.”
Lee’s 4-by-4-inch painting “Untitled (Train)” (2023).Credit...Courtesy of the artist and Klaus von Nichtssagend Gallery
Of course. a painter like me would love this article, but even more, I love this movement away from the gigantic works of Art that engorge museums and galleries world-wide and making them feel like airports and shopping malls. Enough, I say!
Not only do such large Disney spaces seem overwhelming, but they further legitimise an idea that Art is somehow entertaining which it really isn't. There are many over-sized pieces like Jeff Koon's 'Puppy' and Anish Kapoor's polished steel 'Cloud Gate' which are extremely successful public outdoor sculptures, and of both, one could possibly describe them as 'entertaining' to experience, but I wouldn't unless they are under 15 years of age. For me, they answer an audience's thirst for amazement, or even to be surprised into enlightenment. But entertainment, no, I don't think so. (disclaimer, I really like them both and very much in their outdoor context, but I might feel differently if they were parked indoors. Why? I couldn't say, just a hunch.
That said, there is an intimacy in looking at small things because like someone said in the article, they draw the viewer in closer. Personally, and though my paintings are not quite as small as some of these, I've always dreamed of exhibiting a few dozen of them on white walls with at least a meter of space between them so in order to give the viewer a a reflective moment. I like space guy, and I like it everywhere, and in every context, so naturally I appreciated these views in the article.
I really this tiny blue face by Mia Middleton. I think I like especially because it is so small, but tragic too. And as some of us know, small and tragic seem to go well together for some odd reason. Just sayin.
But then, (the elephant in the room), is the greater issue about why Paintings are losing their appeal to the public, writ large. Are we painters destined to also be flung out of the castle and into the dark landscape of illiteracy like our brethren poets? (Say it ain't so!)
The biggest culprit appears to be our obsession with i-pads and smart phones. Have we all lost our souls to these tiny but miraculous devises?Do we have the time or even the ability to focus on an artwork? Maybe, if it's a poor artwork or one of just little interest to us, that's fair to assume, but are we not possibly moving away from art as a form of contemplation and visual reflection? I wish I had an had answer to all this.
So, I am finally beginning the last of the six Gnossiennes, a series of piano solos by Erik Satie that started six years ago. There are short and sweet. I am still working through the last one which is tricky, but towards the end of learning one piece I like to begin even fifteen minutes a day on the next one, a few bars at a time so that when I really do dive into it I'll have a momentum.
Of course, I have to keep up all the others in my head,,,, or my heart, as we say. I cannot still get through them all without making mistakes, alas.... But hey! That's the way it is for us amateurs, for to study, is the whole point.
Th last one is very, very quirky, quinky even and discordantly melodic, in a word; original and other-worldly. In fact, it's like this picture done here in the studio in Myocum just about ten years ago.
Untitled, 7 September, 2015, oil on plywood, 180 X 120 cm, Myocum N.S.W.
Few of my friends seem to have appreciated this painting despite my own enthusiasm, but it doesn't change anything for me because an artist makes what he or she needs to make, irregardless of others.
Yes, perhaps I do live in another age, one from an era wherein the creator lived in a small bubble seemingly excluded from the comings and goings of the big world churning around outside. Then again, I'm not a POP artist, someone who 'needs' to please the general populace. No, in this moment I seem to live in a world created from my own intuitive needs and desires. I wonder if it's not unlike an exotic flower found in some remote spot in the world, a place so inaccessible, that only great aficionados will make the effort to tread. I may be exotic but I do not consider myself 'great' or indispensable to the world at large. I'm just a painter working alone with my own ideas at my own speed.
I suppose one could say that Erik Satie has been a model for me ever since I first heard his piano pieces back in University. Both he and Thelonious Monk made a huge impression upon me in that time of my unhappy life. Their music was so wildly and strangely personal yet at the same time, so classical, traditional even. Something in them inspired me, lifted me up but at the same time also left me feeling that I was lost and I'd never catch the lifeline that all artists throw out to young aspiring ones.
Later, when I went to France and discovered that I might have a talent for something in the Arts I grew more confident perhaps for the very first time in my entire life.
Of course, I hope not to die broke in a tiny cold water studio flat in Paris like Satie, nor go off the spectrum like Monk, but still, because I've always been an outsider, I think I embraced my own eccentricity enough over the years to practice something authentic in my life. But funny enough, over these same years, the Buddhists were teaching me to forget about achieving anything in life by ignoring the whole point of life. What's the point of anything, they quizzically asked me? So I eventually learned that just to be authentic in every action I took each moment was enough. Though not easy, it made sense. Learning any craft like Painting or making music, is still really hard but like Degas said a century ago, "If if weren't hard, it wouldn't be fun." Easy for him to say.
Unlike the picture above, this image from nine years earlier was done in France. It has something of both Satie and Monk in them. Can you feel it?
Nothing Special, Dieulefit, August, 2006, oil on plywood, 180 X 120 cm
The New York Times periodically offers readers an opportunity to spend ten minutes looking at an image. Usually, they are oil paintings but this latest one is an iconic photograph by the much revered Henri Cartier-Bresson.
I have been a fan of his for a long time now despite my 'ennui' in front of many Black and White photos. I am a colour sort of fellow. But, HCB is my great exception to this visual bias on my part.
I have left the following article intact so one can read the follow-up to this exercise by the NYT. (see below)
I can explain why I like HCB so much in a few words. He was an artist (as he himself explained in many articles) who liked to find "des lieux" (places, or spots) where he could 'wait out a picture' that is to say, wait for something to transpire. He liked spaces which lent themselves to a visual contradiction and/or ironic context.
This is my own understanding of course. But I've read accounts by him describing how he would sometimes wait whole afternoons uncomfortably in cramped spaces just for drama, a cat or dog, human or otherwise, to enter his frame and allowing him to grab a photo. He was like a creature who waits patiently for his prey before pouncing on it.
Like the Real Estate people always like to say: "Location, Location, Location". Well, it was apparently the same for HCB. But I would point out that for artists (of any kind), I think "Relationships, Relationships, Relationships" are more apt. All great art is about relationships in a work. And in this extraordinary photo there are indeed, many!
And like it is pointed out in the explanation below, HCB loved spontaneity. Me too! For I paint quickly and spontaneously, and is my favourite mode of operation. But then, I'm obliged because twilight seems to move carefully at first like a butterfly, but then it transforms as fast as a freight train, and I must be on it.
So though I also take lots of photos myself but they are always in colour like in paintings.
Addendum; HCB was also a painter and loved this craft as much as photography.
Evening Prayers Brunswick Heads, 17 February, 2025, oil on canvas board, 30 X 25 cm
(go do the ten minute exercise at the NYT!
Thanks for spending10 minutes and 10 secondswith the photo. If you want to look a little longer, just scroll back up and press “Continue.”
Now, we’ll tell you a bit about it.
In 1932, as he was walking around Paris with his small Leica camera, a young man named Henri Cartier-Bresson came upon a construction fence behind the Gare Saint-Lazare train station. He peeked through.
There, with his camera wedged between wooden slats, he saw a man running across his view and pressed the shutter. The result would become one of the most influential photographs in history.
In the frame, time seems to be stopped. The man is suspended millimeters from the water, as if he may never hit that puddle.
“A second later and the photograph would have been lost to me forever,” Cartier-Bresson recalled years later.
That jump is the obvious focus of the photograph, but the scene is full of visual connections. There are so many, in fact, and in such alignment, that it’s easy to imagine the scene as staged. In reality, the image was captured at precisely the perfect time — the “decisive moment,” as Cartier-Bresson would call it.
“On one side, you can see it’s very clearly composed,” said Clément Chéroux, the director of the Henri Cartier-Bresson Foundation, and formerly the chief curator of photography at the Museum of Modern Art. “It looks like it was composed by a painter that was using a frame and making sure everything is at the right position. And on the other side, there is something which is related to this idea of chance encounters. These two things are completely opposed, and he was able to reconcile these two ideas.”
Mr. Chéroux is our guide to this photograph today.
Photography once relied on clunky equipment and long exposures, but Cartier-Bresson’s Leica was hand-held and allowed him to snap quick pictures like this one. It took him exactly three days to master the new camera, he told The New Yorker in 1989.
He prowled the streets of Paris looking for what Mr. Chéroux called “small miracles.” This is his most famous.
At the start of your 10 minutes and 10 seconds, you might have noticed this delightful connection, with the shape of our puddle jumper and the poster of the dancer in the background:
But there are other doubles in the image, too. These two men, and their double reflections:
The doubled dancer posters (and their reflections):
The words RAILOWSKY RAILOWSKY (and their reflections):
(It’s actually a poster — probably an advertisement — for Alexander Brailowsky, a pianist. The ‘B’ is hidden.)
To Mr. Chéroux, all the mirroring has a psychological effect, evoking the feeling you might get with an inkblot or a Rorschach test.
“You are projecting yourself into this inkblot,” he said. “You want to find significance or a sense of meaning in this doubling effect. I truly believe that this is part of the fascination of this image.”
At the end of the 1920s, Mr. Chéroux said, Cartier-Bresson was influenced by the Surrealist group — writers, poets, artists who held court in cafes challenging conventional wisdom and exploring ideas that came from the unconscious mind.
“All the Surrealists were into the idea of the chance encounter,” he said. “The whole idea that where you were walking in the streets of Paris and you were encountering: encountering people, encountering beautiful things, encountering just light, beautiful light, or encountering a strange situation.”
Cartier-Bresson caught these moments throughout his career, like at the top of a spiral staircase in France, with a bicycle whizzing by:
And here in Greece, a young girl in an Escheresque scene, dashing through the shadows:
Notice the black border on these two images. Notably, Cartier-Bresson said he never cropped his photographs, leaving the edges of the film to show the full frame, as he would have seen it through his viewfinder.
But our image is an exception. If you look at the original negative, the blurred shadow of a fence post crept into the frame. This decisive moment was nearly spoiled, but it was saved by the final crop.
By all accounts, he took great joy in these moments of visual connection.
“For him, photography was a kind of meditation,” Mr. Chéroux said. “Even if everything is going faster today, I truly believe that photography is a way of slowing, slowing down the pace of the world.”
It almost seems impossible that all these elements lined up on that day in 1932 and that one of the greatest photographers of the 20th century was right there to see it.
But the truth is, even if Cartier-Bresson had not been there to capture it, the man would have still jumped, still looked like the dancer on the poster in the background and still had a perfect reflection.
As his career proved, these small miracles are around us all the time — whether we’re looking or not.
You may be holding a camera in your hand right now. Maybe go take a walk and tell us what you see.
