29 June 2020
Sophie’s choice
On the other hand, there is beauty in these crisp black night skies when one can see the Milky Way full of diamonds haphazardly scattered about overhead. I am still lost in this Southern sky and although I regret the shorter days I like these inky black skies and the clement weather.
This week a shy new moon hangs overhead and the ‘blooms’, though brief, have allowed me to work longer. By the third or fourth study there’s just enough light that a faint trace of colour still lingers in the evening air like perfume after a woman has passed by. It’s also been clear this week so most afternoons I get to the beach with high hopes. This is a painting I really like from a few nights ago, it is one of two that evening. Although a viewer would not see it from its warm harmony, I was chilled to the bone when I finished because I’d foolishly forgotten to wear socks or long trousers. Out there when it blows from the South it can be fresh indeed.
When I arrived to set up the sea looked creamy and there were lines of wide ribbons of colour stretching across the sky. I jumped in and had a ball with it. Although it looks a little scruffy around the edges, the overall effect feels complete to me but like all painters would tell you: “I swear, it looked just like that!”
It came so easily I think because I had initially connected so emotionally with all of it, especially the sky. This is a curious way to put it, and to be fair, it’s somewhat rare actually. But even after a few days at home with it away from the beach, this feeling has only amplified in me. It’s hard to describe why, out of so many other pictures that one becomes a favorite over so many others. Why is that? Was it the look of the sky or was it the session that was so pleasurable? Maybe both, because I’m partial to sassy big ribbons that one finds in deluxe linen shops in Lyon. Regardless, sometimes a painter just has a thing for certain pictures for whatever reason. Might this be akin to what it’s like for a parent to prefer one child over another as awful as that sounds? Is it Sophie’s choice?
Because these pictures are done so regularly, I’ve come to see them as paragraphs in a long book, a diary of sorts. Like a diary it’s also a dialogue with oneself, and I’m still finding out all these things about myself of which I’ve never looked into before. Isn’t this why people keep diaries in the first place? But because of this steady dialogue I continuously learn about myself also on a regular basis. The pictures that come up every few days are snapshots of things I’ve learned, but sometimes they’re so incrypted I don’t always understand them immediately. I think I’ve always gotten life in drips and drabs, as they say.
So like I said, I really love this painting for reasons I cannot fully describe. But it’s certainly an emotional things, for sure. And why not? It’s art afterall. But also I like it for its discretion. It was painted quickly, maybe in 10 minutes, and that gives it an air of carelessness that I think disguises all the
elements that make it function quite naturally. There are always loads of problems involved with making a painting, sure, but the painting itself, at the end of the session, is the eventual outcome of fixing all these problems unconsciously. The placement of brushstrokes in these quick paintings create the drawing. In French they call these ‘Ébauches’, or as referring to quick unfinished studies. It was a common slur to the Impressionist Movement as a whole at the time. Today, of course, I think anything goes because we live in wild new world, it’s a go-go period for art writ large, so to make ‘une èbauche’ is no worries at all I think. But as there is no preparation for my own pictures, no pencils indications to contravene spontaneous mood, anything can happen, and it usually does. So when I attacked this already sloppy-looking sky I didn’t hesitate to jump in. I always just say a little evening prayer beforehand to make it come right.
That said, where does the foreground begin in this picture? (and what constitutes the foreground?) Where is the upper limit of the sky? (and of the picture itself?) Do the foregrounds in both the sea and the sky directly overhead sync to create the illusion of distance to the horizon line? There are always so many questions but I never ask them unless I have problems. Like a surfer here in Australia, doesn’t one just jump in and hope for the best? There is an art to almost everything concerning the sea after all and mostly it just requires jumping in.







