28 April 2020
This was the third out of four studies that came near the end of a session a few nights ago. It looks wild and impulsive because the sky was indeed crazy and out of control. Normally, I’m a
restrained painter so it felt really good to get out to exploit my untamed animal at least for a short seance at the beach. The truth is that I’ve rarely been able to let go of my repressed nature and it’s an embarrassing secret, one of many. Neither have I been a rule breaker nor a bar-room brawler, or a guy with a fast car who scuffled with cops. Alas, quite the opposite, I’m the obedient, helpful, polite, and obsequious guy who was never the badass even when I knew it would get me more dates. I‘ve always followed rules and norms unlike many who seem compelled to break them. Among school mates, I wasn’t the thief but the guy from whom who they stole, but none of this doesn’t mean that I haven’t been a jerk either.
I’ve only come to discover all this rather late in life curiously enough. I figured it out gradually after digging away inside myself with miner’s hat on. Most of what I’ve pulled out is just dirt, but occasionally I’ve found a few diamonds. So basically, I’ve come to see that all this ego-restraint came to me early in life, and my fear of authority didn't just happen because I was a choir boy. This conditionned response to life and people is not unrelated to a strict Victorian upbringing right in the middle of suburban America. But hey! Everyone’s dealt a hand of cards, and those happen to be mine.
And this is why I always identified with Alfred Hitchcock who himself, was also terrified of authority. I remember hearing him once in an interview talking about it. He recounted that anytime a police car got behind he and his wife while driving in sunny California he would find himself in a panic. He drove his poor wife crazy with his dread, but of course, subconsciously or not, he exploited it brilliantly in many of his films. Clever guy! I’m not sure I’ve yet found a creative way of putting my bogeyman to use.
But Hitchcock was somewhat of an anomaly because most dramatic screenplays and books draw us in slowly like someone recounting a long ghost story until the surprise ending. Hitchcock's villains, on the other hand, almost always showed up early on letting us know who the killer was so that we would sit on the edges of our seats waiting for them to get caught.
And so, in the world of Painting it's not dissimilar because the artist lets us know instantaneously what's up, unlike in either music, films, or books, all of which, reel us in slowly like a calculating confidence man.
A really, really great painting is like the perfect spouse who knocks you off your feet from the the very first instant of inspection, and from there, it’s usually a long happy marriage. Alas, poorly painted pictures are usually discarded in our mind’s eye in a flash of editorial hubris because the bad picture, like a bad date, will be soon forgotten and deleted forthwith from one’s memory and phone. Yes, it’s brutal, because it’s as rough out there in the art market as it is in the dating world.
Another sad thing about all this, is that a painter who wants nothing more than to please his public at every turn is like a co-dependant lover, full of low self-esteem and desperate for approval. This overwhelming desire to please the public, though understandable, is a deadly trait for any artist, but it's possibly even worse for the ingratiating lover.
But today, happily, I don’t worry too much about what others might think of my work, although that wasn't always the case. What proved catastrophic for me was when I didn’t like what I had painted, and this was a consistent feature of my life. I was too easily crushed and driven to drink by my own self-diagnosed sense of failure regarding my painting. It was a creative form of OCD but with a dash of perfectionism thrown in. But like I said, that was a long time ago, and today, because of these paintings at the beach I feel cured.
I saw the 1991 film Tous Les Matins du Monde from when it came out many years ago and it made a big impact upon me. It's the story of a master cellist who at the end of the 17th century had retreated from public life with his family to the countryside and refused to play ever again in the Court of the King. He became a recluse and practiced in a garden shed behind his home. One day, a young cellist with promise arrived at his door searching him out for lessons. Hearing the young man play he agreed. Of course, being a French film there’s a love angle concerning both betrayal and regret, but what the master cellist confides to the young man at one point is something I’ve never forgotten all these years on. He said (as I remember it), that "he only played for the dead and for those not yet born". It’s as if his selfishness was book-marked between two generations that excluded the present moment.
Curiously, today, I see it all so differently than I did thirty years ago when I had embraced his message. At that time, I only heard what I obviously wanted to hear, that a painter should only wish to please the great heroes of the past. I really liked this at the time, I suppose because I must have been living in a time warp where I had only respect for my own heroes, and little for my contemporaries.
I've certainly changed, and I hope that this has changed too, but in my own secret dreamworld, I think I still harbour a sort of yearning for approval from certain artists of the distant past. For instance; What would Delacroix or Uccello, Giacometti or Morandi have to say about my small studies for instance? I don't think Cezanne would matter because he’d be too cranky, but Lautrec, Yes! And, yes, I know it's a silly proposition but I think all artists of every kind will at times glance over their shoulder after too much whisky or wine, to wonder.
Today, though it would seem obvious for any sane person to grasp how selfish it might be for a great, but stingy musician, to not share his music to the world at large, this notion didn't occur to me at that point in my life.
After much digging into myself, I think it was because I saw the artist as a kind of recluse, a creature alone, misunderstood yet pure. This is a cliche, but it was also how I must have seen myself at the time.
Today, I still see the artist as potentially pure, if indeed their work is authentic. Being an artist, I think, means being strong enough to withstand not just the solitude, but the disinterest of others, because ideally he, or she, has fully accepted mortality. Time, for a painter, is a prison with lots of empty walls to fill.
So, it’s a good thing to re-examine one’s life from all its various stages, to check in and see what is real or not, from all vantage points. How sane have I actually been all this time? For me, I’ve replaced my older and out-of-date emotional files with others more open to these present uncertainties. Today, I mean what I say, and I say what I mean at the risk of upseting everyone, which I do.
This small unremarkable painting, unruly as it appears, isn’t even one of my favourites, but it’s different enough to include here. I like it because I feel like I’m running with Les Fauves even if I trail behind them by a long shot. That’s good enough today.
I’m not a surfer like so many around here in Australia but I feel akin to them now when I’m riding a long, smooth wave in this series of work. In my previous life of discontent, just like in a Hitchcock film, whenever I began working, I already knew at the start of the session who the murderer would be. It was always going to be me.
Throughout my life I was rarely satisfied with my paintings and this made life very difficult, virtually impossible, let's be honest. But because of a few seemingly random events, the course of my life was radically altered and I found that I was able to align myself more closely with the life of a serious painter. This was perhaps only possible because already inside me, lots of templates had been formed years earlier out of my many heroes in this Painting racket. So you see, in the end, a dialogue with one's heroes can be useful.