19 October 2026

Forsake the rose and blush thyself


8 June 2020




Forsake the rose and blush thyself


Evening Prayer Brunswick Heads, 19 June 2020, oil on canvas board, 30 X 25 cm


Whoa, it’s getting cold! Beautiful skies, though I regret the shorter days. It was windy and chilly for this painting from a few nights ago. But in just a few weeks the sun will soon begin its slow arc back up towards the equator. Nice! But to think that in France in this moment, they're picking fat red cherries and eating them right off the trees in the Luberon kills me. 

This study was the first of two from a few evenings ago. It had rained all morning but cleared somewhat by the late afternoon when I arrived to a virtually deserted beach. A large wild-looking red cloud awaited me so I quickly set up and managed to jump into this picture. Interesting, I like the unusual colour harmony  with its cool green sea under an even cooler violet sky, but it works in a curious way. I like especially the free-wheeling sweep of pink sky overhead made of barely three or four brushstrokes. I wish I could pull that off more often because it’s as spontaneous as it gets.  


Someone came over and saw it the other day propped up on my kitchen stove and remarked to me that “it seems so French”. I was unprepared for this particular take on the work, so I stammered slightly before finally saying, “well yes.... I guess so......maybe because,,, I lived there for so long,,,, but also because I learned to paint there”. That was all I could come up with at the time, but it was true.


I was a little taken aback because I couldn’t detect whether or not it was a compliment or a slight. I was surprised by the question, but funny enough lately, I’ve actually been thinking about how schools of art, and schools generally, can form a student’s cultural education. Isn’t it usually after the original innovators had already arrived and made their revolutionary mark on culture that ‘schools of’ sprout up? And doesn’t it also follow, that afterward, the followers and devotees make all sorts of rules and dictums for the subsequent adherents that are sure to follow? This somehow seems natural because there never seem to be enough ‘geniuses’ to go around, at least enough upon whom to fit these crowns. But this is not just reserved for the world of culture, but also to politics, economics, religion, etc, etc... I mean, basically, aren’t we all just sheep?


Throughout the history of all the arts it seems to have always been this way. We've all been influenced by masters, teachers, and great works that have touched us. The trick was for me was to learn to take what I needed and simply leave the rest. Easy enough, if one knows what one needs. But in my own life it wasn’t always so clear about what was going to be good for me. One exception was when I met my teacher Leo Marchutz in Aix. I somehow knew enough that he was the real deal, so I stayed to study with him until his death in 1976.


But because I was a little obtuse, it was usually only much later on when I would understand what it was I needed from a particular experience. Life for the curious-minded is always unexpected, but for the clueless and the curious like me, it was always more complicated.


No longer art students, it seems that for many of us, we bound forth naively and quickly find ourselves far away from our teachers, mentors, and family influences. Yet just as suddenly, we’re alone in our solitary studios, full of questions, and at times, full of despair. 


But all this isn’t a bad thing if it pushes us to discover the right questions which we'll need to ask about ourselves; like, what do we need each day to develop our own authentic voice? If we didn’t, we would likely remain trapped in a prison full of someone else’s ideas. But that is the curse and the blessing of having strong influences in our lives as art students. If one calls oneself a painter, then this thing, we call painting, must become a habit to finding our true selves. Almost all great artists pass this wisdom on to students. 


In the end, for me to be a painter, is a worthwhile activity even when I fall on my face. This has to be my identity, and it’s something I use as both a shield from life‘s cruelty, and a sword to defend myself against it. It may sound awful, or just melodramatic to say this, but there comes a point when every artist must be strong enough to free themselves from their teachers. Like the Buddha himself once said: “if you see the Buddha, kill him”. 


In the end, I have to ask myself: Can there be room inside my own creativity for other authors? Can a bus have two drivers? “Watch the sunset!” I remind myself when I take all this too seriously, or as Shakespeare said: “Forsake the rose! and blush thyself!”


No matter what kind of pictures a painter makes towards the end of his or her life, one would hope to have found glimmers of one’s own real and authentic nature. Maybe painting, as a craft, despite all its ups and downs, is a kind meditational thing, like when people go off for forty or fifty years of their lives to live in a community or monastery ‘to find themselves’. And why not? It’s a good thing to do during a lifetime. I mean, I think it’s a vital thing for anyone to find connection with creativity, because we all need to counteract the cruel craziness of human behaviour sometimes just outside our door. Personally, I prefer studying both piano and painting, which is great luxury because they need time. Isn't anyone lucky to be studying what they wish to investigate? If more people were fortunate enough to practice a creative craft of any sort, the world would be a much happier place I think.


It took me a long while before I could understand this urgency of art. This for me, was like awakening to the urgency of life, the older I’ve become. Doesn’t the practice of anything creative force us to get real with ourselves? The sooner the better I think now, having slept through so much of my life. This search for authenticity has become increasingly vital as I follow my own curved arc through life. And the thing is, art cannot be faked because it’s out there for everyone to see in the work. Is it any good? Was it ever any good? Did one paint pictures to explore themselves or to fall into the trap of seducing the public?Does the curved arc of an artistic life end with a pot of gold like at the end of the rainbow? Or was the pot of gold spread evenly out over a long squirrelly path of curiosity? 





18 October 2026

Sophie’s choice


29 June 2020



Sophie’s choice



Evening Prayer Brunswick Heads, 19 June 2020, oil on canvas board, 30 X 25 cm


So winter nights are here again, and this evening especially, the cold wind feels like a Dr Zeus character with long green arms and legs that slide into my bed each night wrapping its frigid limbs around me. This is one consequence of bachelorhood, but hey!

On the other hand, there is beauty in these crisp black night skies when one can see the Milky Way full of diamonds haphazardly scattered about overhead. I am still lost in this Southern sky and although I regret the shorter days I like these inky black skies and the clement weather.


This week a shy new moon hangs overhead and the ‘blooms’, though brief, have allowed me to work longer. By the third or fourth study there’s just enough light that a faint trace of colour still lingers in the evening air like perfume after a woman has passed by. It’s also been clear this week so most afternoons I get to the beach with high hopes. This is a painting I really like from a few nights ago, it is one of two that evening. Although a viewer would not see it from its warm harmony, I was chilled to the bone when I finished because I’d foolishly forgotten to wear socks or long trousers. Out there when it blows from the South it can be fresh indeed.


When I arrived to set up the sea looked creamy and there were lines of wide ribbons of colour stretching across the sky. I jumped in and had a ball with it. Although it looks a little scruffy around the edges, the overall effect feels complete to me but like all painters would tell you: “I swear, it looked just like that!” 


It came so easily I think because I had initially connected so emotionally with all of it, especially the sky. This is a curious way to put it, and to be fair, it’s somewhat rare actually. But even after a few days at home with it away from the beach, this feeling has only amplified in me. It’s hard to describe why, out of so many other pictures that one becomes a favorite over so many others. Why is that? Was it the look of the sky or was it the session that was so pleasurable? Maybe both, because I’m partial to sassy big ribbons that one finds in deluxe linen shops in Lyon. Regardless, sometimes a painter just has a thing for certain pictures for whatever reason. Might this be akin to what it’s like for a parent to prefer one child over another as awful as that sounds? Is it Sophie’s choice? 


Because these pictures are done so regularly, I’ve come to see them as paragraphs in a long book, a diary of sorts. Like a diary it’s also a dialogue with oneself, and I’m still finding out all these things about myself of which I’ve never looked into before. Isn’t this why people keep diaries in the first place? But because of this steady dialogue I continuously learn about myself also on a regular basis. The pictures that come up every few days are snapshots of things I’ve learned, but sometimes they’re so incrypted I don’t always understand them immediately. I think I’ve always gotten life in drips and drabs, as they say. 

 

So like I said, I really love this painting for reasons I cannot fully describe. But it’s certainly an emotional things, for sure. And why not? It’s art afterall. But also I like it for its discretion. It was painted quickly, maybe in 10 minutes, and that gives it an air of carelessness that I think disguises all the 

elements that make it function quite naturally. There are always loads of problems involved with making a painting, sure, but the painting itself, at the end of the session, is the eventual outcome of fixing all these problems unconsciously. The placement of brushstrokes in these quick paintings create the drawing. In French they call these ‘Ébauches’, or as referring to quick unfinished studies. It was a common slur to the Impressionist Movement as a whole at the time. Today, of course, I think anything goes because we live in wild new world, it’s a go-go period for art writ large, so to make ‘une èbauche’ is no worries at all I think. But as there is no preparation for my own pictures, no pencils indications to contravene spontaneous mood, anything can happen, and it usually does. So when I attacked this already sloppy-looking sky I didn’t hesitate to jump in. I always just say a little evening prayer beforehand to make it come right.


That said, where does the foreground begin in this picture? (and what constitutes the foreground?) Where is the upper limit of the sky? (and of the picture itself?)  Do the foregrounds in both the sea and the sky directly overhead sync to create the illusion of distance to the horizon line? There are always so many questions but I never ask them unless I have problems. Like a surfer here in Australia, doesn’t one just jump in and hope for the best? There is an art to almost everything concerning the sea after all and mostly it just requires jumping in.  





17 October 2026

Satie went out without his umbrella


24 June 2020



Satie went out without his umbrella



Evening Prayer Brunswick Heads, 19 June 2020, oil on canvas board, 30 X 25 cm



I never really struggled with the act of painting, not colour harmony, nor with drawing once I began studying with Leo. Yes, I still could a hard time but I wasn’t clueless like I had been at art school in university. It was more like starting over, like I was learning French after years of studying Latin. At the same time, I had to learn a lot and work at it, but it had never been so foreign to me even from an early age because I had always had an intuitive sense about light. Studying with my teacher Leo, freed me up finally so I could use it. Suddenly, I had both a direction, and a means with which to construct a chassis to draw and paint an image.


Being able to always draw had been the ticket that allowed me to avoid being bullied in schools because I could do something that others couldn’t. It gave me a pass,,, sort of. On the other hand, I also took it for granted too, because curiously, I also assumed that everyone else had those same skills. My real problem in painting arose from me alone and I had to overcome all of my own personnel issues around creativity to make any progress later on. I was my own problem, but art never was.


But curiously, I found a way into sorting out my issues with painting through learning music in my later years. I had always wanted to play piano but had thought I was too old to begin. That mind-set went on for years until finally, at the age of 30, I bought an old piano, and many beginners from another era, I began learning to play simple things by Bach, Bartok.


It was an unhill climb because music never came easy to me like it seems to for so many others. I had to work at it in a way I never had to work at drawing or painting. This was a great opening but at the same time it revealed to me that I hadn’t ever really worked hard enough on my plastic skills in Painting or drawing. I was coasting, which wasn’t a great way to achieve anything. But at the piano I felt like a mountaineer on a cliff face, always in peril and forever trying to save myself. 


Over the years I’ve managed to learn some musical harmony through the Tin Pan Alley charts that led to some of the great Jazz Standards we’ve all come to love today. Like everyone else, I also learned some Bach and Chopin, but it was Erik Satie who led me through dark tunnels and into the trough of hard work. 


At the beginning of the Pandemic I began memorising the first three Gemnopedies, then the first three Gnossiennes which took me two years, but they now live cautiously in my hands and heart. I suddenly realised that if I could do this then I could certainly accomplish as much in painting. Somehow the work on Satie helped me dislodge most of my worst creative insecurities. It felt to me after so many years that I could finally stuff my perfectionism into a pizza oven and watch it burn out of me as a smoky ghost. Henceforth, instead of seeing painting as a final exam, I could begin seeing it as a just workbook. Why, I wondered, could I not I learn to paint for the pure joy of it as I had learned to do on the piano? 


This moody picture is from a few nights ago. It also reminds me of Eric Satie and his wistful music, but in particular, his set of piano works entitled Pieces-Froides. Erik Satie, the much celebrated French composer, lived in a tiny unheated room in Montmarte at the end of his life where he died in poverty. After he died, the story goes that a few friends assembled there, and while they jammed into the small room and drank brandy to remember him, someone opened the closet and dozens of umbrellas spilled out. His friends were surprised to find their own amongst them. They say that he went out with an umbrella even on sunny days, and he apparently had a habit of ‘borrowing’ them from everywhere he went. This is easy to do in France today where cafes and shops provide umbrella bins next to their entrances. 


This image was a bit of a mess because a rain storm came in as I was working and the rapidly moving clouds wrecked my need for stability and structure. But like always, there was that moment in a sky full of flux when I have to take a stand and really commit to the drawing. In this picture though, I kept shuffling clouds around until I made the commitment. Lucky for me that I had somehow preserved those small turquoise windows of light.


But, I like this picture also because it captures an instant almost like a Polaroid, and yet it’s a painting done live at the beach under a windy chill. At first, I wasn’t sure about it but it looks better to me after a few days. It summoned up my feelings of this cold and forlorn afternoon as I left the deserted beach the other evening. It’s winter after all.





15 October 2026

A few days in September





Evening Prayer Brunswick Heads, 18 September 2026, oil on canvas board, 25 X 20 cm



Evening Prayer Brunswick Heads, 18
September 2026, oil on canvas board, 25 X 20 cm



Evening Prayer Brunswick Heads, 18
September 2026, oil on canvas board, 25 X 20 cm



Evening Prayer Brunswick Heads, 22 September 2026, oil on canvas board, 25 X 20 cm



Evening Prayer Brunswick Heads, 22 September 2026, oil on canvas board, 25 X 20 cm



Evening Prayer Brunswick Heads, 22 September 2026, oil on canvas board, 25 X 20 cm



There is a curious film with the title 'A Few Days in September' which I like very much and still watch every few years. It stars Juliette Binoche and John Turturro, who naturally give great performances. Because it takes place between Paris and Venice there are two suitable younger stars to handle the love angle. And Nick Nolte makes a quick surprise entrance and even faster exit at the end of the film. 

Sometimes when I long for France and Italy I put it into my DVD player and play pretend that I'm there, and that I still drink white wine in a quaint bar behind the Giudecca. 

It's a hazy picture this film, and it's full of uncertainties, just like my favourite evenings here at the dusk hour when I come out to paint. We've had some really lovely mysterious-looking skies (and seas) over the past two weeks and I've gone to heaven there each night. Here are a few that speak in hushed tones and muted innuendos. They were done over these last few days of September.

Like the film, these discreet images seem to be masking the truth about what's really going on in the twilight sky. Because they're naturally fleeting, they also hide their mysteries. 

But alas, the rain has returned, and the metéo says it will not leave for another week or two. 

Anouk, a niece of a friend in France came to stay for a few days while traveling around Australia. A lovely woman who sized me up and immediately decided to organise my kitchen. She reminds me of Marie Kondo, the Japanese wizard of decluttering, known in Japan as 'fusui'. 

I will confess that I've let things go wild around here, both inside and out of my small home, my procrastination also appears to have grown like a long beard these past few years. So it was providential that Anouk arrived, and she just got to work with a quiet determined joy of getting a tough task done. 

Lately, I've felt like one of those lone sheep here in Australia that one sees on a TikTok video, the kind which somehow got away from the homestead, and after a brief few years was so weighted down with wool they could hardly walk anymore. But once found, they are brought home and sheared to resemble baby lambs all over again. 

 




05 October 2026

Fragrances


Evening Prayer Brunswick Heads, 19 September 2026, oil on canvas board, 25 X 20 cm


This is from about two weeks ago when I began painting on smaller canvas boards which allow me to grasp the images faster. More compact, they’re better suited to painting the rapidly changing colours and they allow me to casually swipe paint across them with greater ease. I've made a dozen of them this week but this one particularly pleased me. 

Though this would not be for everyone, a fragile study like this seems to be what I'm after in this moment. The marvellously strange thing about it is that I couldn't have known I was after it until I painted this. (!)

This was the last study of the day and the sky appeared to be blushing with a delicate pink colour harmony. After a few years working here, I’ve come to see that these faint secrets overhead are what the sky gives away when it thinks no one else is looking. 

It’s at this fragrant moment when colour sails away like perfume diffusing into the night air. How many people would imagine such intimate goings-on in the sky just above their heads? Not me until I began painting at this hour. How could I have known otherwise?

The weather has been cooperative so I’ve been out most evenings and the blooms are bold but short-lived. Nice.




03 October 2026

Turner, a king in the realm of wise children


Forward


Turner, a king in the realm of wise children



J.M.W.Turner (date ?)Gouache and watercolour on paper 188 x 227 mm


I was sent this small Turner watercolour recently by a mysterious gentleman, whom I didn’t know, a certain Peter Shear from Indiana who is a painter. I believe that he stumbled upon my small blog space l’Air de Rien which has been the skeleton for this book, Evening Prayers at Brunswick Heads. This was a nice surprise. He understood not only what interested me but was kind enough to pass it along. 

It was a shock to see it, for this unpretentious little oeuvre, lacking in any visual presumption is just so perfect and beguiling that I can only weep with envy. Its innocence speaks of a rare and simple vision, one which could likely only come from the hand of an assured artist or perhaps even a very creative young child of rare sensibility on a very lucky and insightful afternoon. 


There is, at certain moments, an awkward honesty in Turner’s voluminous record-keeping of the sea and sky that reveals such a playful abstraction that one could think (if they knew little or nothing about Art) that indeed it was made by a child. But this would be a fairly cheap value judgement by a smug, smart-aleck whose sensibilities are but ruled uniquely by the left side of their brain only, for this is a masterpiece of invention.  


For me, the brilliance of this tiny and unobtrusive little souvenir is beyond description. This child-like innocence belies a profound vision, one that was not only cultivated by a lifetime of looking at Nature, but also by a lifetime of experience and talent that is buried deeply within the structure of these four corners and behind its quiet and simple design. 


But also hidden within this simplicity are the essentials of picture-making. There is a foreground, a middle-ground, and background, which all together, seem to come racing up to the viewer all at once as one plane, and it replicates how the visual world operates. In Painting, this is called abstraction, and it has to be learned not only through patience and practice but also through a generously extensive understanding of Art History itself. 


This is because our eyes don’t naturally allow this to happen due to our inability to focus on all planes simultaneously. It is therefore left to the artist to reconfigure this physical impossibility so that we, the viewers, can imagine it. But this sounds way more complicated than I am making it out to be. To put it simply, our eyes generally only reveal to our brain, at nanoseconds at a time, an entire organic view of the world as we look out at it, one instant after the next. It is why some painters will squint their eyes whilst looking at a landscape in order to ‘see it’ as one whole organic form in their mind. But to paint it as one whole viable form can only be achieved through an abstract process, one by which, both a gifted child and a painter like Turner, perform so intuitively. 


This means that normally, we cannot, without practice, perceive a landscape as painters have learned to make them because they were re-created using a kind of abstraction built by planes that move forward and backward on the two dimensional surface.  There is no doubt that a landscape painter will surely look out at the world quite differently than a gardener whose macro-view of intimacy is at a different scale. Conversely, imagine a mouse suddenly seeing his familiar landscape from 100 metres above in the claws of a hawk? 


The painter must be inventive. For instance, he or she needs to build a kind of visual scaffolding that can fashion a foreground, middle ground and background, which when viewed all together, might not be readily apparent to the rest of us because our eyes don’t naturally take them in as one. This is a necessary invention, an  'abstraction' that all painters, from early toddlers to professionals, devise to create their own personal systems with which to make pictures. 


Viewers don’t realise any of this because they don’t have to think about it, it’s a given, and it’s instantly taken for granted. Though most serious viewers of art can sometimes detect when an image falls flat, it’s less evident to discern the attributes of a painting when it succeeds. But the ones that fail usually do so from small bruises throughout like on a fresh pear.


But a painter like Turner, through his experience, knows how to ‘read the room’, intuitively. Like other great artists, He understands intuitively how to reconfigure the visible world through a connivance of both talent and gumption to reconstruct the logic of a landscape and to fashion it into a painted image. Alas, for the gifted and clairvoyant child (and a few lucky painters and visionaries) it’s always innate, yet for most painters it needs to be learned. I was a painter who had to learn it because I had already lost my own creative child much earlier in life, so none of this came intuitively to me until much later on when I re-discovered my early love of painting. 


Put another way; the ‘Academic Painter’, of which there are many prestigious adherents, are trained to paint Nature (landscapes and models), as a compilation of separate parts, attaching them through a painting technique alone. I think that an academic painter appears to be trained to only see a picture as separate parts, things to be attached to one another and joined bit by bit. Consequently, the end result resembles a patchwork quilt, albeit maybe full of skill. But worse, the academic painter only seems to look at the landscape just once,  and at the very start. They then proceed with that concept already established in their vision. A fellow like Turner would naturally be assessing the ‘motif’ from start to finish and yet might even be loyal to his first impression. I know this from experience because I’ve had problems trying to understand this dilemma of working spontaneously over a shadow of memory. 


But unlike this process, a painter with a vision like Turner’s, sees everything as an organic whole image, and one all at once in his mind. The secret of this mind is that it has learned to make sacrifices in order to achieve a whole picture plane, one that we call a painting surface. This is why Turner is such a great example of seeing the ‘motif' as a unified visual idea, one already formed mysteriously in his mind. Like so many other really great artists who produced large pictures in the studio, he managed to hold onto his vision (and memory) throughout the long process.


Either because of his long experience or his immense talents, or both, he saw everything as one, not unlike a poet whose stanza has been stripped away of the extraneous to expose the bones of his feeling.






02 October 2026

Dazed

 


This is a reprint from 29th December 2009 when I lived in France. I couldn't resist putting it back up 17 years later.








Finally, to the poterie studio where I have put off too much work before I leave for Australia on friday. Yikes! But I'll get it done.







Its easy work but I need to be inspired and I can easily burn out after three hours








I end up feeling like these teddy bears look, dazed and confused.