22 February 2025
Out of mind
I didn’t think too much of this picture when I packed up the other evening but I like it today. I like the light which is fragile and nuanced especially the brightest set of small clouds over the horizon to the left. Higher above there are patches of pale blue which I suppose is the sky, and though I painted, it I’m not even sure. In visual terms, I just appreciate them as mere patches of colour to set off the golden clouds and which help to enrich them. These are the ‘accidents’ that happen when I seem to be ‘in the painting’.
In this spontaneous work from nature I find myself most present when I’m not there. I think everyone loves this space when they're plugged into something they're fully engaged in doing. It's something that's so natural for children but it can easily become lost with age.
In my life it hasn't happened all too often, but now it seems more frequently. Sometimes like when I play tennis, yes, but not always, and rarely is it continuous but I’m working on it.
There is something particular about painting from nature that pushes me into this mind space. It’s different than working in the studio where the picture is more like an opponent on the tennis court and something to vanquish, than a friendly communion. Because these spontaneous pictures rarely take me more than twenty minutes to paint, the effort to concentrate is pretty easy. It's not brain surgery, so thankfully for everyone, I'm not a surgeon.
This effortless joy from connecting with a picture out in nature comes both from the submission to the motif, but also more crucially
to that place inside me where I'm absent too. It's where I’m at ease in my head, and like an escalator, I intuitively know where the next step will be taking me.
Here at the beach, nature requires my complete submission from that space deep inside me. Perhaps like most people, being headstrong, I’ve never been adept at giving into anyone or anything very easily so to get into this quiet space also requires a special kind of discipline all its own.
This suddenly reminds me of my visits to a friend who lived not far from me in NYC. He was living in a small loft building that had an elevator that stopped and opened into each loft space.
One of those very curious and universal habits in life is that whenever any of us enters an elevator, we all immediately turn around to face the elevator door. It's a strange almost mystical custom why we do it, but we do, and it seems to make sense. So now facing the front we all remain reverently still as the doors quietly close and the elevator either rises or falls. The custom also requires that we we look down at our feet or above to watch the speed of its progress. Just over the digital floor indicator in this particular elevator there was also another illuminated digital message that read OUT OF MIND in a stretched Ariel font in an eery pale Prussian Blue. It was a surprise, and my friend told me the developer had been a follower of Osho, of the Poona clan in India and they were really big on clever affirmations. Indeed, each time I rode the elevator I was pleasantly taken by surprise. It was very sexy, like a great logo, and for some reason, it made me think of a thin cloud.
In the West, Out of Mind can conjure up either a mellow ecstasy trip or a crazy person on crack cocaine running through the streets with a long knife in one hand. But in the East it generally portrays a mental state that most spiritual practitioners desire to attain.
But Out of Mind can also just be in that empty space where we are at one in the world around us with or without drugs. It's a place of wonder and it's what I find at the beach when painting. Surprisingly, almost always, I get there and it's why I always go back.
But aren't we all looking for that space in these anxious times? Clearly our social apps are a mere substitute, yet like a companion, they appear to wrap us up in a cocoon of solitary comfort. Would there be as many dating apps if everyone were content with themselves all on their own?
There are rooms everywhere full of yoga and meditation practitioners too, which is a good thing because we are know how crazy life can make us. Because I'm a latecomer in finding this comfortable space in work, I've only eventually come around to understand the real value of creating art. Great or poor, whether we like the result or not, it doesn't matter as long as we learn something creative for ourselves alone. Creating anything is already great because it's always just the first step.
Of course playing and performing music, is the most common way of accessing this place. Making music has universally been the go-to space where one can practice ‘out of mind’. It’s been known as the place of ecstasy for us humans since forever, but ironically many of us in the West think we need to be ‘high’ to get into this space. Go figure. But when the space is clear, it’s the real deal, and when we have experienced it even just once, like being in love, we’ll always try to get back into it.
In the Painting world there was movement at the turn of the 20th century when artists and some writers, tried to attain this creative space of rapture through spontaneous ‘mark-making’ which today has become a style all its own. The Belgian artist Henri Michaux (1899 - 1984), was one of its leading proponents and in many of his ink drawings he used mescaline to access his inner mind. Though not exactly the Whirling Dervishes, the idea was to let go completely and connect with a trance-like space of unity through any artistic process. Artists have always dabbled in drugs to achieve a state of unity, so it was nothing new, but the work that came out spawned a new school of what was called in France ‘Les Signes’, This is hard to translate due to it many nuanced meanings but the Larousse Dictionary seems to come the closest to what I’m trying to express. “An ensemble of conventional gestures constituting a symbolic basis of non-verbal communication." (my own translation)
Michaux’s ink drawings are wild abstractions and very seductive. In artistic nomenclature, they are Non-Objective, maybe even some of the first Non-Objective paintings to be offered up to the Art World at the time\ though I‘m not sure Michaux considered them commercial. For him and his fellow painters I think they were considered personal images, like diaries. This was after all, the modern world of Freudian analysis when looking-inward was no longer a sin.
So Michaux was part Tachiste, part Surrealist, part poet and painter. Being a creative soul, he was all these things but also he was cerebral, and somewhat intellectual when he needed to be I imagine. The early years 20th century were heady times, but rich and brave times too. One thing for sure, he invented a style of working long before Pollack began making his own pictures by splattering enamel onto a canvas from the paint store.
But why do I bring all this up now? Something in this picture above reminded me conversations I used to have with a painter I knew in Aix. He was quite mad about ‘les signes’, and indeed, they played a pivotal role in his own understanding of how paintings are put together because these gestures are really the basic elements of any painting. All painters from any any period, whether its Raphael, Giotto, Vincent Van Gogh or Miro, are have been constrained by these gestural rules of painting.
So curiously, when I looked at this painting from the other evening, not unlike hundreds of previous images in this series, I suddenly saw it in a new light, as a accumulation of abstract gestures. Of course, this is a figurative image, but it still shares all the elements of an abstract one like in Henri Michaux's ink paintings. The difference is that mine is organised in a different way. Instead of looking inward for inspiration, I look outward towards the evening sea and sky to find a way inside of me.
I am reminded that in this history of painting it’s always been about taking, discarding, and stealing and destroying. Artists need to be ruthless if they’re going to find a way into their inner selves. And in this series as I’ve probably iterated ad nauseum, the drawing of a painting is made up of these ‘signes’ or 'gestures'. That they all come together to form a whole image is remarkable and it's always surprise whether it’s non-objective or figurative image. What come up should hopefully satiate the creator until the next collision with paper and pencil. Contrary to Michaux, I organise these gestures to create a figurative image, but I think that we're both after a luminosity by using the method of Chiaroscuro to achieve it. Unlike even Cezanne, a picture like mine above is more 'Renaissance' than 'Impressionist' because I’m still after the various kinds of natural surfaces appearing in this physical world of concrete elements (i.e. clouds, air and water).
The later Cezanne, and perhaps all the true Modernists onward from the Impressionists through Matisse and the Fauves, approached every painting surface like it was a mosaic full of brush strokes, often wildly uneven at times, but fluently distributed regardless of Natural’s tactile diversity. This technical side of Modernism is one of the less discussed aspects of it, maybe because it’s not part of the larger and more theoretically seductive side of its social contours. To be honest, I only just came up with it for myself while writing this. I think because it’s a painter’s issue, not one for a larger historical discussion which academics generally like to swim around in. I'm a painter so I’m on always on thin ice around academics.
But, this is a big conversation, more than I had wanted to chew off here. I would need a whole chapter of examples and documentation to further explore it. But because I am a painter, not an academic nor a critic (in the worldly and economically driven sense), it might be above my pay grade as they say these days. Basically, I’m really only interested in my own understanding of Painting and Art as holistic ideas and selfishly for me alone. How to create and make things that work successfully on a two-dimensional surface is always the real deal for me.
Though this picture certainly triggered off a lot of different ideas, it's really somewhat simple. There is almost nothing to it. And this pleases me because when I step backward and look at any picture, I want to see it all at once, then move in closer to see its inner intimate beauty. And this is not unlike the same way I discover people when I meet them.
But in this picture I was curious about how these marks and brushstrokes have an antecedent in the works of the Surrealists and Henri Michaux at the start of the 20th century. Though I don’t live in that world, I like to dip my toes in it from time to time.