6 March 2021
Monday! a day for Piero della Francesca!
Monday! A day for Piero della Francesca, whom I can never get enough of. They say (some idiot back in the day) that all roads lead to Rome. Well, in the world of Painting, I wonder if all roads don’t just lead us back to Arezzo and Piero della Francesca. I think somehow that there is enough in his whole oeuvre to please just about everyone who loves art, even the Post-Modernists.
Although I try not to speak with others about politics, art, or religion, I sometimes cannot help myself because in the news the other day was an article about all the idle rich people who travel around the globe looking fabulous. At the same time, I had been looking at some photo details I had taken of the Piero della Francesca’s at the National Gallery in London, and it occurred to me that no matter how rich one might be, one still has to face one’s ageing body and mind as well. Nothing, I think, will decay a mind faster than spending all one’s time and money being fabulously rich. But hey, that’s me. There are those (usually in Europe and Asia) who can sometimes handle immense wealth that has been kicking around in the family for centuries, but on the other hand, too much old money can also cast longer shadows over a family lineage. Being American, of course, we know about being rich, but far less about preserving culture, which is a kind of wealth unrelated to the size of a bank account. It may sound obvious but I think in the end that it’s better to be a poor and happy person than a rich unhappy one. And, I can personally affirm that being a poor but happy artist is also better than being an unhappy and rich collector. Though I’m obviously in a tiny minority on all this, I think that culture is a quiet currency that cannot be withdrawn at the cashier. Culture, unlike money or possessions, cannot be stored in a vault.
The solution to all this lugubrious thinking is of course to spend some time with a fellow like Piero della Francesca, whose light will quicky banish all darkness from a tarnished soul. Being a painter, I am assaulted by a multitude of questions in his presence: How does one construct a picture? How do colours work together in order to create an overall harmony, and why is this necessary? Could we paint without it? And what is Light in a painting? And more importantly, is light the same as luminosity? And as painters, how do we look at his work, then how do we the see it? How do they lodge in our memories, and what do we then learn from them?
When in London, I’ve always visited him in a small room in the Sainbury Wing at the National Gallery. In front of the frescoes there I am astonished by the bright colours which appear to have been seeped in light, even bathed and pampered in it, like a newborn. This colourful luminosity had never before seen the light of day, and though many have come close, no one had ever painted like Piero, either before him, or since. We had to wait until the harsh Provencial light of Cézanne to witness again anything as supernaturally as effervescent. Both he and Cezanne evoked the sheer joy of painting pure light. Both also employed chiaroscuro with great subtlety.
I approach him not as a professor nor as an historian, because I am neither, but thankfully just as a painter. His frescoes are not to be understood in a book or indeed even lectured about, but to be seen and grasped with all our own shortcomings as painters in the 21st century. His vision demands that we respond to him through our own work as painters. After all, is all his delicious work just a remnant of a distant past and simply disconnected from the world of art today? I don’t believe that for a second because personally, I see the future of painting in it.
I have had this lurking notion inside me for a while now, it’s that when a painter (like me) looks around at what others are doing I can quickly feel lost. The zeigeist of today is a unicorn, like a rainbow that everyone wants a part of, but the thing is, it doesn’t exist in the current moment. It’s only a moment in the past that we retroactively ascertain as a time of great important change from a future vantage point. So the zeigeist is really a cul-de-sac for a practicing artist. Personally, I think the future is usually found in the past, not in the present moment. Though we all do it from to time, it’s a precarious pastime for artists to be looking around ourselves for validation.
Now, after all my pontificating, I must also speak about my own endevour at the beach the other evening. Due to the floods last week, I hadn’t been able to get out at all but the roads have cleared enough for me to go to the beach the other night. The clouds which were forecast in the afternoon never arrived so it was a delicious sky. This is one of two from the other evening. It gave me that age-old feeling that I had somehow missed my vocation of being a pastry chef. It’s not brilliant or anything, but it felt really good to be out painting again on the dunes. I do like the swab of thick bleached peach sideswiping a bit of lemon-yellow, already encrusted and pasted over a thin sky. If there had been any light left to see my palette I would have continued as the sky was still quivering with energy. By the time I left the beach there was no one to be seen anywhere. And besides, at that hour, most people would be scurrying home to Netflix and not up looking at the waning twilight sky. Had they, they would have seen sky still teeming with colour.






